Blog

As organizations lean more heavily on data to inform people’s decisions, psychometric assessment has moved from the margins to the mainstream. It is now routinely used in hiring, leadership development, and succession planning. Yet its growing popularity has not always been matched by growing clarity.

Organizations don’t lack leadership training.
They lack leadership clarity.
Every year, companies invest heavily in leadership training programs — workshops, offsites, simulations, and speaker-led sessions. Attendance is high, feedback scores look healthy, and participants leave motivated. Yet leadership behaviour on the ground remains inconsistent, decision-making quality does not improve meaningfully, and succession pipelines stay fragile.
The failure is not in training design.
It is in the assumption that training alone creates leadership capability.

Organizations don’t fail at change because they lack intent.
They fail because they confuse activity with intervention.

Organizations invest significant time and resources in hiring, learning, and performance management. Yet, many leadership teams still find themselves asking the same questions…..

For a long time, Indian organizations trusted experience to carry people decisions. And for a while, it worked. Leaders knew their teams, HR relied on judgment, and spreadsheets filled the gaps.

In most Indian organizations I’ve worked with, performance does not break because people lack capability.
It breaks because they stop speaking.

Indian organizations are experiencing one of the fastest workforce shifts in decades — skill gaps, culture challenges, hybrid work transitions, and rising compliance complexity. These pressures have resulted in increased demand for HR consulting services, especially from mid-sized companies that need expert support to strengthen people systems.

Indian companies today face overwhelming hiring challenges; resume inflation, high applicant volumes, skill mismatches, and rising pressure to hire faster. A psychometric test for hiring has emerged as one of the most effective tools to bring fairness, accuracy, and consistency into talent decisions.

A few months ago, I was working with a fast-growing company where teams were exhausted from constant change.
One afternoon, during a leadership workshop, a young manager said something that stayed with me:
“We’re adapting so fast that I don’t know what we stand for anymore.”

Most leaders obsess over innovation tools, culture decks, or the latest “collaboration platform.”
But here’s the strategic blind spot: none of it matters if people are afraid to speak the truth. Psychological safety isn’t a