Blog

There is a particular pattern that repeats in training budgets across Indian organisations. A department head flags a performance concern. L&D responds by booking a vendor and scheduling a programme. Participants attend. Feedback forms are collected. And three months later, the original performance concern has not moved.

Most training rooms carry a familiar rhythm. Participants arrive, settle in, and spend the first hour catching up with the basics. The facilitator repeats foundational concepts that half the group already knows. The other half feels rushed. By the time the real work begins, the energy has already fragmented.

Generation Z, broadly defined as those born between 1997 and 2012, now makes up a growing share of the Indian workforce. The earliest members of this cohort have been in employment for five or six years. The majority is entering the workforce now or will do so within the next two or three years. By 2028, Gen Z will represent a significant proportion of front-line employees, junior managers, and early-career professionals in most Indian organisations.

Indian organisations have never moved faster. Digital transformation projects, restructuring exercises, post-merger integrations, hybrid work transitions, and leadership changes have stacked on top of each other in rapid succession, particularly since 2020. Many of these changes have been necessary and well-intentioned.

There is a quiet assumption that runs through most Indian organisations’ approach to capability building: that learning requires an external expert. A vendor with a programme. A consultant with a deck. A trainer flown in from another city.

Organisations across India are investing more than ever in structured talent decisions. Whether it is hiring for critical roles, identifying high-potential employees, or building succession pipelines, the demand for skilled competency assessors has grown sharply. Yet one question keeps surfacing in HR communities: what does it actually take to become a certified competency assessor, and why does it matter so much today?

The assumption that remote and hybrid onboarding is just like traditional onboarding with video calls added on top has cost many Indian organisations their best new hires.

Two years from now, the majority of routine L&D tasks in Indian organisations will involve some form of AI assistance. Content curation, needs analysis drafts, quiz generation, learner communication, training calendar scheduling, and initial course outlines will all be tasks that AI handles either fully or partially.

Self-directed learning has become a default answer for many L&D teams facing budget pressure and headcount constraints. Give employees access to a platform, load it with courses, and expect them to take ownership of their own growth. It sounds reasonable in theory. In practice, completion rates tell a different story.

Most talent teams in India sit on more hiring data than they realise. Application numbers, offer-to-joining ratios, time-to-hire figures, first-year attrition rates by source, interview scores, manager ratings at 90 days. The problem is rarely a lack of data. The problem is that this data sits in separate spreadsheets, separate systems, and separate minds, and nobody has connected the dots in a way that actually shapes who gets hired.